Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without Explicit Consent

Cass Sunstein

Americans being used as organ harvesting machines

Folks you can bet on it. If the Hussein administration has it’s way, the Harvesting and Exploitation of Human Organs will be the Order Of The Day. No pun intended. The USA will be selling Life and Death (as if they aren’t already).

I’m sorry people, but this eerily reminds me of a book I read by Robin Cook, Coma. Where innocent people check into the hospital for innocuous procedures and never come out, but are instead comatised for organ removal later. Good grief people wake up and realize what the diabolical BHO and company are doing to this country.

Not only his radical views on human organ harvesting, but also his (NO ANIMAL LEFT BEHIND STANCE, here at The Obama File) However, there’s one troubling portion of the new Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Administrator’s C.V. that has seems to have flown under everyone’s radar: Cass Sunstein is a radical animal rights activist.

Sunstein has made no secret of his devotion to the cause of establishing legal “rights” for livestock, wildlife, and pets. Forget that steak or Lobster if this wack job has his way! Ahahah

(CNSNews.com) – Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken…Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done… 

This problem could be remedied if governments changed the laws for organ donation, they said. Currently, unless a patient has explicitly chosen to be an organ donor, either on his driver’s license or with a donor card, the doctors assume that the person did not want to donate and therefore do not harvest his organs. Thaler and Sunstein called this “explicit consent.”

They argued that this could be remedied if government turned the law around and assumed that, unless people explicitly choose not to, then they want to donate their organs – a doctrine they call “presumed consent.”

“Presumed consent … Sunstein said…“presumed consent” system would make it easier for doctors to convince families to donate their loved one’s organs.

… This shift may make it easier for the family to accept organ donation.”

The problem of the deceased’s family is only one issue, Sunstein and Thaler said…the government can solve through a system of “mandated choice.”

Entire Article